Fig completions are made by a group of unpaid volunteers and are incompatible with any other completion system
Fig pretends to be developing the product collectively in the open, but don’t give any code back to the community
of course they’d welcome everyone who wants to be an unpaid volunteer and improve their product in their own time without any expectation of a return
https://github.com/withfig/fig/issues/35
is it morally correct to exploit your contributors trust like that?
Fig completions are made by a group of unpaid volunteers and are incompatible with any other completion system
Fig pretends to be developing the product collectively in the open, but don’t give any code back to the community
of course they’d welcome everyone who wants to be an unpaid volunteer and improve their product in their own time without any expectation of a return
https://github.com/withfig/fig/issues/35
is it morally correct to exploit your contributors trust like that?