If you look at life expectancy in the America, it has been flat to reversing. Understandably with added pressure from Covid, but at a rate higher even with Covid higher than all other well resourced major nations. This not because we are unable, but because those with the power are unwilling to engage fundamental issues. Covid is not the only issue for which this is the case - it was happening before covid.
Multiple major issues with scientific and economic root causes are simply being ignored as stability and promises of improved prosperity provided by civilization is going backwards. This is meets my definition of falling apart.
>> If you look at life expectancy in the America, it has been flat to reversing.
>> Multiple major issues with scientific and economic root causes are simply being ignored as stability and promises of improved prosperity provided by civilization is going backwards.
How much of this can be explained by the fact that one third of adults in the US are obese as opposed to major scientific and economic issues?
IMHO, falling life expectancy is a macro measure of multiple failing institutions, not a singular cause.
Obesity is driven by systemic commercialization and sugaring of our food supply, combined with inequality of too low a pay, too many hours, to little vacation. Even funding of highway and road infrastructure over other areas is a contributor here.
Another large part of it is because we elect to keep both private health insurance policy which ends up being racially and economically biased, and what little social safety we provide is riddled with self-imposed rules of means testing and other red tape cutting the effectiveness of even the meager allocation of resources. Many very easily and economically preventable illnesses and deaths keep happening and that is a decline to me. e.g. https://www.propublica.org/article/black-diabetics-lose-limb...
Let us imagine that starting tomorrow every single American is granted infinite endless and free access to anything available at any restaurant or grocery store or other food service. Do you think that in 10 years the obesity epidemic would be: better, same, worse?
I have trouble imagining that it would be better. Look at people who come into access with large sums of money for reasons outside primarily mental achievement - athletes after leaving pro sports, musicians after they stop performing, actors after they stop acting, lottery winners, and so on. Some quick searching turned up articles like this [1]:
"The researchers found that the athletes' weight held steady for over 100 years, with the majority of them weighing in at what is considered "normal," -- i.e., with a body mass index (BMI) between 18.5 and 24.9. However, around 1991 the average player's BMI began to rise, and over the last 25 years nearly 80 percent of players fall into the overweight or obese category with a BMI above 25. "
There's a strong correlation between socioeconomic status and obesity, but that doesn't mean it's causal. Obesity is primarily driven by a lack of impulse control. If you force yourself not to over-eat, you could live off of even McDonalds without becoming obese.
Good science always leaves the door open to alternative explanations, even when it may be unlikely. In this case the researchers were relying on BMI to measure obesity. BMI doesn't account for musculature. To not even consider this possibility would be the domain of agenda-driven research, which this paper clearly was not.
Here is a link to the actual paper [1]. Their concluding statement was:
"Professional athletes are not immune from the
growing obesity crisis and may not provide optimal role models of health. Concussions have drawn
attention to overlooked long-term health consequences of sport participation. Increasing body
mass in professional baseball players warrants similar attention for its potential impact on long-term
morbidity and mortality because these players hold
a special place as role models of health and human
performance in our society."
Spot on. BMI is a bad indicator of individual health and fitness. I have a BMI of 25 right now but that’s because I added 14lbs of muscle over the last year while dropping a couple pounds of fat. Body fat percentage sitting at 18%.
Now, there are lots of big boys in the NFL that definitely have a couple extra pounds on them, which could also be skewing numbers.
It would be an accelerant for sure, but maybe there would be a self-selecting correction: people with no self-control over food intake would just die out over the centuries (assuming there are genetic and cultural factors involved in food intake south control).
And why is obesity rising so quickly in nearly all first world countries but particularly in the US? Most of the research points at three reasons:
1. Modern food systems - fast food, frozen boxed food, and a severe lack of access to healthy whole foods
2. Income inequality - Obesity rates are far higher in lower income people and healthy food is far more expensive
3. Work culture - We work far more hours and far less physical jobs. Less hours to exercise and more cost to exercise.
Sure individuals can find ways around all these issues but the more roadblocks we as a society put in people's way the more that will fail. Which is is exactly what the OP is talking about, major scientific and economic issues cause far worse health outcomes.
Folks in the US are on average very fat and very ignorant, not a great combination if you would prefer to have people that are healthy and/or capable of improving their own life.
"Multiple major issues with scientific and economic root causes are simply being ignored"
Such as?
"but because those with the power are unwilling to engage fundamental issues."
It's possible that some issues they are unable to address because there are legal or practical hurdles. For example, obesity is a massive issue that is dependent on individual buy-in. Things like addiction and crime could use improvement, but they are both highly complex issues and not easy to solve. Of course most systemic issues are difficult to solve in a democracy simply because they need a lot of support to have any momentum, especially if individual and states' rights/liberties heavily protected in the democracy constitution.
What if that is the only choice they are being offered? When you go into a supermarket you are already being surrounded by awful food. The only good food there is the food you cook from scratch.
It's like the food industry is "conspiring" against you. Obviously they are not, they just deliver crap quality to make more money.
Yes, education is definitely part of it. It’s possible to eat one meal a day (intermittent fasting), it’s a choice many aren’t educated about (hunger pain goes away after a few minutes, esp. if there is enough water intake).
Multiple major issues with scientific and economic root causes are simply being ignored as stability and promises of improved prosperity provided by civilization is going backwards. This is meets my definition of falling apart.