I won't edit my post. Maybe I did use bad wording. I will contemplate that.
I don't think Go is "bad". The important point to me is the expectation that Go will adapt to its user community.
For example, I am not at all surprised that Go has bad abstractions for files under Windows. I would not expect Pike or Thompson to care about Windows. I would not try to make Go work as a cross platform language.
I'm not asking you to edit your post per se, I was giving feedback that your post is (1) flame-y and (2) not very compelling because it leans more on loaded language than it does on reasoned argument (and there are plenty of reasoned arguments to be made against Go, including, for example, the Windows file abstraction argument in your more recent post).
I don't think Go is "bad". The important point to me is the expectation that Go will adapt to its user community.
For example, I am not at all surprised that Go has bad abstractions for files under Windows. I would not expect Pike or Thompson to care about Windows. I would not try to make Go work as a cross platform language.