It wasn't a point to debate, it was an observation that I find it interesting that these two orthogonal issues:
1. whether an industry built on people doing business with each other has physical centralization effects, and;
2. whether that same industry is built on decentralizing the product/service/technology at the center of its business...
Should:
3. Be in opposition to each other.
There's nothing particularly important about that, it's just interesting to me that "decentralizing finance" may decentralize the instruments, but not the industry itself in a certain sense.
Exchanges to fiat aren't built on decentralizing anything, they are explicitly about centralization. Why would it be interesting that a financial company would have an office?
1. whether an industry built on people doing business with each other has physical centralization effects, and; 2. whether that same industry is built on decentralizing the product/service/technology at the center of its business...
Should:
3. Be in opposition to each other.
There's nothing particularly important about that, it's just interesting to me that "decentralizing finance" may decentralize the instruments, but not the industry itself in a certain sense.
That's all, really.