I know this is a kind of stupid little thing, but I really wish they'd rebranded more completely if they were going to do this. "That box has a MIPS processor in it. But not a MIPS processor, a MIPS RISC-V processor." We're going to end up with OSs list on their "supported platforms" page things like MIPS, MIPS64, MIPS-brand RISC-V.
To be fair this isn't an announcement of a product or anything like that, so their line of RISC-V processors could have distinct branding e.g. FooBar RISC-V Processors (by MIPS).
Totally agree though that they should probably be careful and put some thought into how they brand these.
Those are versions of the same(ish) ISA and are (usually?) backwards compatible. I'd mind less if MIPS-the-company made CPUs that were RISC-V with a MIPS-the-ISA compatibility mode, or otherwise actually had continuity; it's the apparent plan to throw away the ISA but keep the name that's jarring.
Cortex M0+ is ARMv6-M. ARMv8 has also an M variant, Cortex M33 is ARMv8-M mainline. ARMv6-M and ARMv8-M have quite a lot of things in common, as v8 is a superset of v6. Or did you mean ARMv8-A? Well, ARMv8-A and ARMv8-M are not compatible intentionally, as the the A variant is strictly 64-bit (some implementations support AArch32 though) and the support for thumb instruction set has been dropped.