To me it reads as being colored by a very specific tool bias. For example:
>> The key difference between Jd and most other database systems is that Jd comes with a fully integrated and mature programming language.
Most major database systems come with a fully integrated and mature programming language.
>> Row orientation works for small amounts of data.
It works for a different data access pattern. Row vs column is a tradeoff spectrum. Data size is just one dimension of the analysis.
>> Row oriented is slavishly tied to the design ideas of filing cabinets and manila folders. Column oriented embraces computers.
Pretty hyperbolic.
Like ... pl/[pg]sql? Not exactly a joy to write.
And I do believe you wouldn't have any issue finding people who think the same of J.
And regarding maturity—j has libraries, debugger, etc.
To me it reads as being colored by a very specific tool bias. For example:
>> The key difference between Jd and most other database systems is that Jd comes with a fully integrated and mature programming language.
Most major database systems come with a fully integrated and mature programming language.
>> Row orientation works for small amounts of data.
It works for a different data access pattern. Row vs column is a tradeoff spectrum. Data size is just one dimension of the analysis.
>> Row oriented is slavishly tied to the design ideas of filing cabinets and manila folders. Column oriented embraces computers.
Pretty hyperbolic.