How can they say it's a "superstar" when her paintings sell for $10-70K while a Da vinci sells for $400M. It's not like there are more than 30 of her paintings in circulation from what I could find
It doesn't say it's a superstar. it says she was a superstar. What does the current, rather absurd, valuation of a Leonardo have to do with the status of a painter four hundred and fifty years ago?
> It's not like there are more than 30 of her paintings in circulation
