Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm not sure that part of Scott's article was accurate.

I worked remotely, and I'm pretty sure that I was offered benefits. I declined them, and used my wife's benefits because they were less expensive, and meshed better with local health care providers.

EDIT: And I know we had a 401K



I worked there and have evidence that this statement in the blog is not true, and I'm being down-voted?


Downvotes are fickle things. Unrelated, why turn down the health care? With double health care you can tell you're health provider you've got double coverage and they will bill the primary first, and then the secondary for what is left (and if the secondary is designed to be a primary program it will cover all that is left so you end up with zero out of pocket, even for co-payments).


Because it was CA focused, and I was remote. So most local providers were out of network. And it was not free ... Its been almost a decade, but I seem to recall that it was cheaper to add me to my (then) wife's coverage.


It’d be pretty annoying to have a Kaiser Permanente focused insurance plan and live in Ohio.


American health care is ridiculous, episode #193993.


We are starting to copy it elsewhere, it's going good in the same direction in baby steps.


I don’t know if it’s illegal, but basically every health care plan will deny you if they know you have other coverage. This is bad advice.


You’re wrong. It is perfectly common to have double coverage. I had it on multiple occasion. You can read about it if you google “coordination of benefits”.


You’re right. I don’t know if this varies by state, but for sure I’ve had to sign contacts stating I didn’t have any other insurance in order to start various plans. So I don’t think this is universally ok but clearly there are situations that allow it, seemingly most common in conjunction with Medicare.


This is funny, because basically every insurance here in Sweden states that if you are covered by another insurance, then this one is invalid. In practice though what Iv'e heard is that the companies will always just be kind and sort of split the responsibility between them instead when something happens.


Is this generally the case? If so, I had no idea...


Generally different jurisdictions have different rules, but in California it is the case. And to another point made here, if you're employer is going to deduct some of your paycheck to pay premiums month to month then it can be a net loss if you won't use it enough to offset what you would have been paid.


Thanks - I need to do some research on this!


I don't think so, your comment is black text for me, so it's either at it's original score or higher.


[flagged]


[flagged]


There’s a reason guidelines ask you not to discuss downvotes, which always fluctuate. You were adding pure noise to the thread, and you tripled down on that.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: