> So if two literal paintings made centuries ago can cause a hash collision, there's no way this ever should have been considered for matching against files that no one else can see or research with for the most serious crime/reputation damage imaginable.
It simply does not follow that the classifier for CSAM would have the same rate of false positives. There isn't enough information to infer that.
It simply does not follow that the classifier for CSAM would have the same rate of false positives. There isn't enough information to infer that.