There's a difference between telling people what to eat and incentivizing things that give off a lot of greenhouse gases.
With automobiles, the governments are trying to incentivize greener solutions. With food, things like subsidies incentivize processes that give off a lot of greenhouse gases. Should the government incentivize differently for food than for cars? By incentives I mean things like subsidies. Tax dollars.
What makes cars different from the food supply chain when tax dollars are being spent on subsidies?
With automobiles, the governments are trying to incentivize greener solutions. With food, things like subsidies incentivize processes that give off a lot of greenhouse gases. Should the government incentivize differently for food than for cars? By incentives I mean things like subsidies. Tax dollars.
What makes cars different from the food supply chain when tax dollars are being spent on subsidies?