Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
The solved riddle of the Apple-1 serial number (apple1registry.com)
88 points by DamnInteresting on Feb 18, 2022 | hide | past | favorite | 31 comments




It's the 7 that's the giveaway.


The zero as well...the start/end stroke overlap happening top/left-ish.


This article is written in a seriously weird manner.


It seems the main purpose of that website is to pump the Apple-1 market. It shills certificates of authenticity, outrageous auction prices and makes preposterous claims like "the Apple-1 is the rarest microcomputer in the world".


As soon as PSA was listed as the verifier, my shill detector started going off. They are a very shady company


How so?


Yeah, it feels like the author wrote all the things they wanted to say as separate sentences, sometimes multiple times, and then randomized the order of the sentences. Really weird structure.


It's a press release, the material edited to several lengths in order to increase adoption among the press agencies and other recipients. I have seen this practice a few times.


I agree. But also, the author is not a native English speaker.


Why is It important to know who wrote these serial numbers?


Obsessing over small details like this can be illustrative of the company culture at the time. Knowing that Steve Jobs himself wrote the numbers means that they handled all parts personally to some degree.

More bluntly, on a site devoted to a single computer model, every shared scuff mark on some part will get obsessed over by someone.


"company culture" may be overstating it a bit. It was just Steve and Woz, and someone had to write the serial numbers.

Ron Wayne had already come and gone, and Daniel Kottke didn't join Apple until the next year (although he had been a friend of Steve's for years).

When I ran into Steve in June 1976 at Country Sun Natural Foods in Palo Alto (it's still there!) and he asked me if I could write a 6502 disassembler, it was pretty clear it was just the two of them. He wasn't even 100% sure on the company name yet, and tested it out with people he met. "My friend and I have this little company, we're calling it Apple Computer. Take a byte of the apple, get it?"


Out of curiosity and your story was interesting, I LinkedIn stalked you. You’ve had a long interesting career with a lot of overlapping jobs. Were you an independent contractor?


Well thank you, I am flattered that you tracked me down. Yes, I kept bouncing back and forth between contract work and FTE over the years. It wasn't a grand plan to do one or the other.

Since you're asking, I may as well tell more of this story. After Steve and I exchanged phone numbers, I thought the 6502 disassembler sounded like a fun project. So I went home and got to work on it. I didn't have a chip to test with, so I wrote out the code with pencil and paper and "tested" it by stepping through it mentally and writing the register and memory values at each step on a second sheet of paper. Kind of like what you would today call a "debugger".

Then Steve called me: "Mike, I've thought about this. Your experience is all with mainframes. We're using a microcomputer, and it works on completely principles. It is nothing like those mainframes you've used. So I've decided that you couldn't possibly do this job."

(It wasn't exactly a "job" at that point, like I said we were just a couple of scruffy hippies who ran into each other at the produce aisle, discovered we were both into computers and electronics, and got to talking.)

I tried to explain that I'd coded in assembly and machine language on two or three different architectures already, and the 6502 looked like just another one to me, with a simpler instruction set.

He said, "No, I've made up my mind. You couldn't possibly do this, so forget it."

So I thought "Who is this Steve guy telling me I can't program? I will go visit this Apple Computer and show him my code!"

I found their address at 770 Welch Road near the Stanford Barn, walked in and looked around. It didn't look like a computer company, all I saw was a row of switchboards and telephone operators. I asked one of them, "Where's Apple Computer?"

She said, "Uh, this is their answering service."

I thanked her and walked back out, shaking my head and telling myself, "These guys are flakes. They're never going to make it."


Now back to your question about contracting.

Not long before this, I'd read some business book that advised against getting stock in a company as an employee. The book said that as one individual, you couldn't really have much effect on the stock price, and you would be better off just negotiating a better cash deal. Something like contracting, or just getting a better salary.

After all, this is the standard advice we give people joining startups, right? Get the cash, because that fabled upside is unlikely to ever happen.

But sometimes I wonder what might have happened if I had pursued this Apple connection a bit more. I thought, "I might have become a billionaire!"

And then I remember how much that book had influenced me. I probably would have told Steve, "You keep the stock. Just give me a little more cash."

Based on how he treated some early Apple employees, I bet Steve would have been fine with that!

https://www.google.com/search?q=steve+woz+you+give+him+zero


What could have been. I never bought a real assembler for my Apple //e in the 80s. I wrote assembly by doing.

    call -300
    !


Was the mini-assembler moved on the //e? On our school's ][+ it was:

    call -151


My bad. You’re right. Most smaller assembly language programs were loaded at $300. The first page of the text memory buffer was $400.


Your process reminds me of how I used to write 6502 assembly in high school—I didn't have the money to buy one of the macro assemblers I would see advertised in the Apple mags (let alone buy a computer of my own—I would stay after school to code in the computer lab), so I would write out my code on graph paper, and hand-assemble it (with a column to keep track of the memory address) and then type in the hex code in the monitor.

I can remember thinking about an idea to write a relocatable 6502 program loader which would go through the code and rewrite addresses of memory references so that code could be loaded into whatever slot of memory was available for it to coexist with whatever Applesoft program was running next to it.


Knowing that Steve Jobs himself wrote the numbers

I have been repeatedly told by the Woz worshippers on HN that Jobs was nothing more than a salesman who has zero involvement with the actual machines.

If I can't believe revisionist internet historians, who can I believe?


One of Jobs' first jobs was a board tech at Atari. He must have had some circuit-level skills to stay employed, even if he could only follow pre-made designs and the troubleshooting tactics of those around him. He could probably solder components on an already-designed board like any of us could if we put our mind to it.

It seems correct that Jobs didn't have the skills to design a large circuit board from scratch then pore over IC datasheets to try and minimise the amount of components used, coming up with some beautiful triumph of electrical engineering. That was all Woz.

(I'm not any sort of Jobs fan or Apple zealot, I just like tech history and truth)


More importantly, it was the Steve Jobs of the time who wrote those numbers, not the Steve Jobs of billionaire Apple fame.

When you've only a few employees and you need to ship, everyone pitches in.


The downvoting proves it: irony is dead.


The way I have always thought about it is we don't really know what will carry meaning in the future. We don't know the real questions asked, or why, or anything really.

So, what we can do in the now is just resolve it all as best we can, preserve and communicate it forward in high fidelity.


They're rare collectibles, Jobs is an idolized cult figure who allegedly rarely signed anything. Presumably being written by him may substantially increase their value.


I love this move to explore our computing history.

It's a lot more than the popular retro machines. It's so much, languages, people, systems, ideas...

Enjoying all of it very much. We have a rich history filled with vibrant people who really got after the future in their own way.


The start of the greatest hustle of all time.


Uh...Steve said he didn't write them. That will cast serious doubt on this as more years pass.



Changed to that from https://9to5mac.com/2022/02/17/handwritten-apple-1-serial-nu.... Thanks!

(From the guidelines: "Please submit the original source. If a post reports on something found on another site, submit the latter." https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html)




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: