Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is the only thing you need to really watch about this nonsense: https://youtu.be/EKTZ151yLnk


Funny how we all know the YouTube video is more credible than the peer-reviewed study. If I had to explain why to a stranger I'd really struggle.


The study makes no claims about why 432Hz is better, it just reports what they measured. I listened to the examples in the video myself and the 432Hz version really did feel about 1.0185 times as relaxing.


>> "I listened to the examples in the video myself and the 432Hz version really did feel about 1.0185 times as relaxing."

I tried to reproduce your result but I came out with 1.0815 times as relaxing. Are you sure you didn't commit a transcription error -- I doubled-checked mine.

Also: I had the BASS BOOST turned on my $9 bookshelf speakers while I listened. Did you have BASS BOOST on or off?

</sarc>


It should have just mentioned that Hz includes the arbitrary definition of 1 second. If we wanted real/natural values, everything should be done in Planck units.


That's a great point


I knew right away this was going to be Adam Neely.


thanks for sharing.. sums up all conspiracy theories




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: