This is not true anymore. From Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger:
>Wikipedia Is Badly Biased
https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/
It's completely untrustworthy on anything remotely political. Very, very mainstream narrative compliant/reinforcing.
- Every page has a steward who (thanklessly) keeps the information accurate, up-to-date, and ad-free
And many of them inject their personal biases.
For hard science stuff, math, and celebrities, it's pretty trustworthy but as I said, anything remotely politicized will always have the same slant.
Is the complaint here really that some political narratives don't like being reminded what they have said or promised?
This is not true anymore. From Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger:
>Wikipedia Is Badly Biased
https://larrysanger.org/2020/05/wikipedia-is-badly-biased/
It's completely untrustworthy on anything remotely political. Very, very mainstream narrative compliant/reinforcing.
- Every page has a steward who (thanklessly) keeps the information accurate, up-to-date, and ad-free
And many of them inject their personal biases.
For hard science stuff, math, and celebrities, it's pretty trustworthy but as I said, anything remotely politicized will always have the same slant.