Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Not nessesarily, alternative approach is to overbuild them 10x so thay we always generate more wnergy than we need and have continent spanning super-grid because it's always windy and sunny somewhere.



Today Boston has a sunrise at 11:47 am utc and Los Angeles has a sunset 1:30am utc. That is 10+ hours where the USA gets zero sunlight. Inconveniently, we also hit peak energy usage during those 10 dark hours.

So if you want to ignore the storage problem, you need to rely on wind only. And if you have to dramatically over provision production to be able to meet demand, the cost benefits disappear.

Storage is a must for renewables to really take off.


> And if you have to dramatically over provision production to be able to meet demand, the cost benefits disappear.

"Not cost-effective to be the majority of power production while CO2 pollution is free." is very different from "near useless".


> the cost benefits disappear

But I am not claiming there is any cost benefit at all - alI am claiming it's doable, and we will have zero or negative electricity price on windy days, that coupd be put to good use for electrolysis, hydrogen production, etc.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: