> I don't know why you're arguing with me back and forth like this.
I am trying to understand if the claim you are defending:
> concatenation is a natural product, not a sum
has any merit. I'm "arguing" to see if you have any rebuttals to my objections to your reasoning before I conclude that no, it doesn't.
Going back over this thread I am puzzled by one thing: that original claim was not yours, it was from /u/naniwaduni. You opened with "string + string". Why are you now so vehemently defending "string * string"?
Oh, and just for the record:
> Make those two words mean something instead of literally giving them strings, and see what they tell you.
Well, yeah, of course. Addition applied to fruit is a different operation than addition applied to strings. So?
I am trying to understand if the claim you are defending:
> concatenation is a natural product, not a sum
has any merit. I'm "arguing" to see if you have any rebuttals to my objections to your reasoning before I conclude that no, it doesn't.
Going back over this thread I am puzzled by one thing: that original claim was not yours, it was from /u/naniwaduni. You opened with "string + string". Why are you now so vehemently defending "string * string"?
Oh, and just for the record:
> Make those two words mean something instead of literally giving them strings, and see what they tell you.
Well, yeah, of course. Addition applied to fruit is a different operation than addition applied to strings. So?