A step in the right direction: vagueness of fair use chills valuable expression. That is, copyright overrides human rights, and a recognition of the evil that this comprises.
This article also recognizes that "infringement" per se is probably economically advantageous.
But the bias of the writers is still pro-copyright. In the final paragraphs they end up stating outright that copyright is the only way to protect an author's income or something like that. The authors of the article are still on the slippery slope of copyright, which will ultimately lead them to sanctioning copyright over human rights.
This article also recognizes that "infringement" per se is probably economically advantageous.
But the bias of the writers is still pro-copyright. In the final paragraphs they end up stating outright that copyright is the only way to protect an author's income or something like that. The authors of the article are still on the slippery slope of copyright, which will ultimately lead them to sanctioning copyright over human rights.