> but they're a community-driven project I'm not sure how reliable it'll be long term
Don't take this the wrong way, but subtly/implictly implying that some software is not going to be reliable in the long run because it only has a community behind is low-key FUD.
Nahh you're right, that's not a fair criticism at all, and we rely on tons of community-driven stuff. I only meant that as a differentiator because to some companies, they need to know there's a company behind the project for support purposes or they're not gonna use it (whether or not that's fair of them).
Don't take this the wrong way, but subtly/implictly implying that some software is not going to be reliable in the long run because it only has a community behind is low-key FUD.