On: Archaeological dig reignites debate over the Old Testament’s historical accuracy

We've switched from "Is the Old Testament historically accurate?" (which was the HTML doc title, not something the submitter made up, but still too baity) to the page title, which seems more factual and neutral.

I would never imagine the Smithsonian would do a click-bait like this.

The pressures, alas, are merciless on everybody, and it seems like they all cave eventually. Even august science journals are doing it increasingly.

We get to take a different approach here because the economics are different, which is sort of a miracle if you think about it.

>which is sort of a miracle if you think about it.

Yeah, but does the miracle reaffirm the old testament?

Jk. Keep up the good work, Dang

Their online history publishing group is very clickbaity in my experience.