Safety factors; testing; and inspection are engineering.
The Smartbolt doesn't eliminate engineering.
More importantly, safety factors; testing; and inspection are progress. We have robust assemblies built first time based on rational analysis and formal processes. We have sky scrapers, suspension bridges, and space telescopes.
Obviously it doesn't eliminate all engineering. What it could do, though, is reduce costs. The idea is you could potentially achieve the same level of safety with less material or less testing.
Those things are progress in a sense, sure, but...
It's as if someone finds a way to make an alloy less prone to metal fatigue, and you just say "but you can use thicker metal, and test more." Sure, but.... well I don't see the point explaining this further to you, but I assume people reading this that don't see everything in black and white already understand.
Does that give you the ability to have nuanced, big-picture, long-term view thinking?
You might as well argue that someone who works in a bank must understand macro-economics, or that someone in the military must have an excellent grasp of foreign policy.
You are steeped in the status quo. Your thinking on this is expected.
The Smartbolt doesn't eliminate engineering.
More importantly, safety factors; testing; and inspection are progress. We have robust assemblies built first time based on rational analysis and formal processes. We have sky scrapers, suspension bridges, and space telescopes.