Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

IMO if you want to replace ls it has to be a 2 character command. I can type ls super fast with two hands. exa is really awkward to type.



I have 'lsd -al' aliased as 'l', it works fantastic.


I aliased `ls` to it… I don’t know how long ago. It’s been great.


what can break when you alias standard system command name to some random program downloaded from the internet.


one-liners you copy and paste!

no seriously, when you properly alias something in your .bashrc, they only take effect in an interactive shell.

ie: an `alias ll='ls -halF' in your bashrc does not work if you do `bash -c 'll' nor `./fileThatContainsll`


alias

.. but exa is not backwards compatible with ls OOPS

Which is why I stick with ls (and grep instead of rg and coreutils instead of shiny rust equivalent), I can't deal with the cognitive dissonance that arises from these differences.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: