`"hello" + myFooObject.toString()` Can you eliminate that? It's impossible to say without knowing whether or not `myFooObject.toString()` is effectful. Maybe the JVM can make that assessment. Maybe not. I don't know, but it's not as trivial as "knowing what string concatenation does".
A straightforward way to do this is for Java to assume built in types like strings are side effect free, but custom types may not be. This would likely cover a good portion of log lines but not all, obviously.
The noop determination is made during runtime within the log method called. So, it's LOG.info(obj.toString()), wherein that method inspects the log level setting, then decides whether to ignore.
Are you saying that Java does or should "optimize" in such a way that it branches to the logic within each method called during runtime, inspects which code would be executed per possibly mutable runtime values (like log level), considers possible side effects (in-method and in parameters) then decides whether to even invoke the method at all?
Isn't the point that you don't generally stuff your log of things that are only strings but of things that can become strings?
(Asking since I know of your work with truffle)
A typical logger.info("user {} did the thing", user) can skip the actual string interpolation and user value stringification, if the log level is not > info. However, logger.info("user " + user + " did the thing") cannot avoid at least the execution of user.toString(), even after jit optimizations, unless the jit could prove that toString does not have side effects. But I don't believe the jvm jit tries to do that. Am I wrong?
