Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That takes me back.

I wrote SH-3/4 simulators that were significantly faster than the actual parts. (The cheat was that the simulator ran that fast on an early 200MHz Pentium while the SH-3 was something like 35Mhz.)

I also wrote a synthesizable[1] SH-5 hardware model that was cycle and signal accurate at every module boundary and ran >100k cycles/second on said Pentium. (SH-5 was a 64 bit successor to the SH-4 that also had a 32 bit mode that ran SH-4 code. I don't know whether it ever shipped.)

[1] The cache, TLB, and floating-point weren't synthesizable. Making them synthesizable would have killed the cycles/second.



Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: