>they would have shown the same level of corruption
Would have? Meaning the emails were not released?
>colluded with Russians
>the same level of corruption
>shady business dealing
>tainted the waters so greatly with politics
>their corruption in Ukraine
These are all perfectly generic accusations. My point is, you need a sound bite or slogan that is not generic. That evokes something specific, and a context. If you don't care, why bother saying anything?
>The playbook is accuse your opponents of your crimes.
Yes, it is. How do you, and how should we, tell the difference between two sides accusing each other in similar terms?
Would have? Meaning the emails were not released?
>colluded with Russians
>the same level of corruption
>shady business dealing
>tainted the waters so greatly with politics
>their corruption in Ukraine
These are all perfectly generic accusations. My point is, you need a sound bite or slogan that is not generic. That evokes something specific, and a context. If you don't care, why bother saying anything?
>The playbook is accuse your opponents of your crimes.
Yes, it is. How do you, and how should we, tell the difference between two sides accusing each other in similar terms?