"Not all users named rektide are missing the point"
Look, I didn't say it, it was just a joke I quoted someone else saying, so now you can't respond to me as if I said it,
or the fact that I quoted it. And anyone who points it out or responds to it, especially users named rektide, are radicalized.
(Though I don't think this is uniquely a rektide problem.)
i am entirely completely unaware of what point you are trying to make. in the first, & in your after.
i am not really very offended by the joke at the heart of this. i think it is a fairly accurate & truthful & not really a joke at all.
i have a really really hard time parsing your cryptic texts & i would like you to make some clearer more discussable points, if you have commentary to offer. to me, there's a basic parallel, a call that we have to differnetiate, showing that when we dont, we fall to primitive extremism. this seems fair & due & respectable.
(I don't think this is a uniquely conservative problem. Not related here really, but space for ambiguity, un-knowing seems scarcer.)