Some might cheer and say "Ha! Auto-hoist, petard-wise," but this latest submission points to the page that documents the continuing saga. They have addressed many of the criticisms leveled at the paper in the submission wo which you refer, and carried out both further studies and a meta-analysis.
Hence I thought it worth re-visiting.
Having said that, the discussion on that submission is definitely worth reading.
Some might cheer and say "Ha! Auto-hoist, petard-wise," but this latest submission points to the page that documents the continuing saga. They have addressed many of the criticisms leveled at the paper in the submission wo which you refer, and carried out both further studies and a meta-analysis.
Hence I thought it worth re-visiting.
Having said that, the discussion on that submission is definitely worth reading.