> That's absurd. There is no scientific basis that would support your assertion.
Why are you so confident in that? Have you done your research? I learned that from a licensed psychologist, and know several people who have had severely negative reactions to "mindfulness" training, but it only took 30 seconds to find these two links:
> If you can't sit still with your own thoughts for 60 seconds without spiraling, then you shouldn't even be remotely near social media.
Not exactly disagreeing with you here, but neither is meditation necessarily better. Therapy is probably the best thing, but social media is "free." And, note that I'm not in favor of social media, merely explaining the cost-benefit analysis that people in this hole use. Reasoning from your high horse will result in different cost-benefit analysis, which won't make any sense to the people whose lives you might like to improve.
I would be wary with different meditation practices. I don't think it's a one-size-fits all.
Zen Buddhism and other traditions have very long history and experience with meditation. Now the West unfortunately sometimes imports ideas superficially, and meditation might be one of them. 'Mindfulness meditation' seems to have specific suggestions that probably haven't stood the test of time (or scientific evidence as mentioned).
However, sitting a few minutes quietly (without worrying about specific technique) shouldn't do any harm, is probably good for you.
Also very emphasized in those traditions is controlled breathing. It can be very helpful when stressed as well.
If it makes you feel unwell, stop doing it! Also maybe consult with someone with experience.
Why are you so confident in that? Have you done your research? I learned that from a licensed psychologist, and know several people who have had severely negative reactions to "mindfulness" training, but it only took 30 seconds to find these two links:
https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210202-how-mindfulnes...
https://www.newscientist.com/article/2251840-mindfulness-and...
> If you can't sit still with your own thoughts for 60 seconds without spiraling, then you shouldn't even be remotely near social media.
Not exactly disagreeing with you here, but neither is meditation necessarily better. Therapy is probably the best thing, but social media is "free." And, note that I'm not in favor of social media, merely explaining the cost-benefit analysis that people in this hole use. Reasoning from your high horse will result in different cost-benefit analysis, which won't make any sense to the people whose lives you might like to improve.