I remember work for pie has been featured here before, though they have added more details now which is great. Though I believe http://www.gitalytics.com/ gives a more detailed analysis based just on github contributions.
Hey, I like the look of gitalytics! I have never before seen a site that dug into my history deep enough to highlight that one tiny documentation patch I made to a comparatively high-profile project.
In a way it outshines my many commits to my own unloved projects; most analyzers don't pick that up.
It's been clear for some time now that, among top developers, Github has started replacing the resume. Work for Pie seems like a convenient way of getting -- at a glance -- an idea of the quality of a developer's Github profile.
The point system seems too opinionated for me. For example not all devs have to use hackernews to be good, but its required to get a higher score. Also what happens when you hit 100? Is there really a perfect score?
The workforpie logo also makes me think im slaving away at tasks just to get a higher score.
I can't seem to get it to connect to my BitBucket account though -- I keep getting a "Sorry, We couldn't retrieve any data for this account." message. All the other services worked flawlessly.
Neat to see confirmation that the current scoring algorithm is multi-pronged and percentile based. Apparently my score (/dpritchett) is almost entirely propped up by HN karma.
