Jobs that must be on-site (medical, manufacturing, etc.).
Going fully remote results in:
- Profit on real estate
- No/less expenses on utilities
- No expenses on relocation packages
- No expenses on custodial staff
- No/reduced expenses on office furniture
I mean, from a cost perspective, fully remote is clearly a big boon for a company. Either Microsoft is truly seeing reduced worker productivity from WFH, or there is another incentive, but it's not strictly economic.
Big offices tend to be in urban areas that without the offices for people to work, have less demand for that expensive housing. Itβs also expensive to convert and not ideal for manufacturing or other uses.