Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Git history was only rebased in after the Twitter thread [2].

Any source to this? Your referenced link does not support your hypothesis.




You can see the original commit history in forks of nanocolor that occurred before Andrey Sitnik rebased:

* https://github.com/antonk52/nanocolors/commits/main

* https://github.com/corysimmons/nanocolors/commits/main?after...

You can, indeed, see that they lack all of the original repo's commits.


In addition to what others have pointed out:

https://twitter.com/jorgebucaran/status/1441886210998239238

The commits in nanocolor's git history also don't include Jorge's verified signature, which would come with the fork.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: