This sort of performative signaling isn't helping the cause you are ostensibly championing. There's ways to interact with other people that don't start out from a position of confrontation, those are far more likely to prevent folks from having a knee-jerk dismissal response to you.
Or because no one likes being lectured by pompous self-righteous strangers on a topic barely relevant to the article. Especially when it's something we've all heard a thousand times before presented as if it were a gift of great wisdom.
I agree in this particular case but the exception proves the rule. Shoving vaguely applicable yet mostly useless proverbial advice into internet comment sections is a great low effort way to be rewarded with virtue points. There are a few examples elsewhere in the comments of such. Had he been more tactful about how he worded the topic it likely would have been better received.
In my case, it's because a managerial position is an ephemeral role you voluntarily step into. Accepting a managerial role means accepting certain rights and constraints, including things like the topic of the article.
Being told you have similar constraints simply because you were born with a certain configuration is both arguable, completely lacking any nuance or insight, and mostly original-sin tinged dogma.
Don't like it? Fix your society; it's what the rest of us are trying to do. I would love for basic interactions with strangers not to be tainted by gender-based power dynamics, but here we are; if you're in a position where you can ignore it, chances are that society has labelled you “more powerful” (more able to do what you want without social reprisal, etc.) and ignoring that is making other people uncomfortable.
