One of the things after working with zig for a bit, is that the dangerous stuff is cumbersome to write (not hard to read, though), and has lots of fiddly bits like @ signs... So your eye is drawn to it as if to say "here are the parts of the code that need careful review".
Relative to c, though there are imo fewer special chars:. Zig adds ! and ?, Which are there for really good reason, but subtracts for example <> and #.
The hardest thing is the . syntax for anonymous structs and tuples, but to be fair it is very consistent, and so many times I'd think,"hey I wonder if..." And then try it with the syntax and of course it works.
Relative to c, though there are imo fewer special chars:. Zig adds ! and ?, Which are there for really good reason, but subtracts for example <> and #.
The hardest thing is the . syntax for anonymous structs and tuples, but to be fair it is very consistent, and so many times I'd think,"hey I wonder if..." And then try it with the syntax and of course it works.