> they finally deleted the woman’s photo, but then promptly replaced it with another Andrea Vassell
Sounds exactly how they handle false positives in the Google Safe Browsing list.
I get that they want to avoid costs by automating everything, but if the automation has already failed for something it should not be allowed to modify that again without human review.
Sounds exactly how they handle false positives in the Google Safe Browsing list.
I get that they want to avoid costs by automating everything, but if the automation has already failed for something it should not be allowed to modify that again without human review.