Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I think the energy economics are different for planes and cars, though. There's no equivalent of regenerative braking, or for that matter stop-and-go traffic, for planes.

And adding weight to a car doesn't make it use more energy at high speeds, which is how an old van can get 15 miles per gallon while a fully loaded semi truck gets 10 miles per gallon. Adding weight to a plane does make it use more energy. The effect of adding weight is relevant because batteries weigh almost 500 times as much per joule as fuel does.



> There's no equivalent of regenerative braking

Point the nose down with the power off?


Nose up to slow down: altitude = stored energy


Right, but you don't need an electric airplane to do that. With cars, electric is much more efficient for stop-and-go driving because regenerative braking becomes possible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: