Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The wording also suggests that polluting the sea would be more acceptable than polluting land area.



Well, the ocean dillutes whatever you dump into it to much lower concentrations than the rivers do when you dump something into their drainage basins.


I think we unsuccessfully conducted a similar experiment with the atmosphere already.


There's a huge difference between things like global CO2 emissions, and this single fire which is probably a tiny insignificant fraction of that.


The attitude that the oceans are huge and that it is just a minor event here or there that could not possibly affect the sea a lot is exactly the source of the problem. A fire here, a garbage patch there, some mercury from gold mining, ... it just adds up.


It adds up sure, but this is an issue of lesser evils.

It’s better to have a ton of CO2 emitted into the atmosphere than into my living room. That’s not to say either are good.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: