Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

“The mysterious <common thing> that has baffled <expert professionals> for <inordinate amount of time>”

— Click bait sub editor




Yeah, the headline certainly follows the clickbait tropes. But in this case, it appears to be legit - experts actually don't know and the vendors keep it a closely guarded secret.


It kills me that every researcher the writer contacted has never actually seen the plant or bothered to go look for it, including the guy that studied agave!


that's academia for you. lots of book smarts, useless at street smarts.


It's not a question of the competency of academics.

> So why is there still doubt about the identity of this snack? “Which species of agave is it—Sisalana or Americana or any other?” Dr. Shimpale says. “We can’t conclude until the vendors show the plant to us. They keep this as a business secret to create curiosity around it.”

The vendors won't give them access to the source, so the academics can't practice their botany.


According to the article, the vendors might not know the full story, since they get it from distributors.


I'm not sure what your point is; the title is an entirely accurate summary of the content of the article.


I didn't read the article because it looked like click bait.


I thought it was interesting. Who knew that Indian street food was wrapped in so much mystery?


> I'm not sure what your point is; the title is an entirely accurate summary of the content of the article.

You may not have seen this before, but that doesn't mean it is "mysterious".

Do you find Coke or KFC "mysterious"? Those are snack foods with trade secret recipes. Your story is about something similar.

A simple google search will take you to this youtube video, posted in 2015. Read the comments to dispel the "mystery".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dck923eejQA


The comments don't mention anything that isn't in the article.


A lot of "baffled scientists for decades" is more that the scientists know about it but have never taken time to look as there are other things to do. It is a ridiculous spin.


Except, as mentioned in the article, they _did_ look into it, to the extent of DNA testing it! And still didn't come to a particularly satisfactory conclusion. "It might be an agave, but also the agave expert says agaves aren't like that" is about as far as anyone seems to have gotten.


> Except, as mentioned in the article, they _did_ look into it, to the extent of DNA testing it!

What do your experts make of this wikipedia article?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maerua_oblongifolia


Well, the experts which were consulted by the writer of the article have this to say:

> I had a breakthrough a few months later when I came across a thesis paper by Dr. MS Rathore, who had propagated Maerua oblongifolia in the lab in 2011. He had seen the tree many times in the desert state of Rajasthan. “But I haven’t heard or seen anybody eating the root,” the scientist said over a call, sounding puzzled.

> “Its roots are sparse and inedible,” added Dr. NS Shekhawat, his thesis adviser and a retired professor of botany. “Growing in dry regions, where will it have so much water to develop big roots and be fat and juicy? [The snack] can’t be Maerua oblongifolia.”

Which seems to provide a little bit of a counterpoint.


If you read 4 paragraphs into that article, you will find out


Try harder and follow the links

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlwOrdciEX8


So, it's an unclassified botanical specimen. That's not really a "mystery". It's just an unclassified botanical specimen.

This makes the product application of the root even less mysterious:

"It was seasoned with salt, chili powder, and lime; my husband’s had sugar and lime. It was crunchy, juicy, and refreshing, but had no taste of its own."


It's _extremely_ weird that there is a commonly sold food, and no-one can figure out what it is. In particular, the vendors are unwilling to talk about it, and where pushed vaguely claim it's an agave, but the agave expert says it's not (of course, maybe he's wrong).

The whole thing is fascinating. It's a low-stakes mystery, but a mystery all the same.


Based on the comment about

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raphide in agave can be toxic. And the fact that it is only sold in paper thin strips. My guess is the vendors are aware that it is poison but in those parts of the world life is cheap and money is hard to come by. So they just ignore this and carry on selling it. Anyone asking might be there investigating the cause of some of their health issues.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: