The slave labor reference was an attempt to duck the troll who (absent it) would say "Slavery isn't a voluntary association with a company and X, Y, and Z are pretty much slavery so there".
If you had bothered to engage with my actual point (that our social norms make it more acceptable to judge people on their voluntary associations and actions than on their involuntary features) you might be less frustrated.
> "I recommend you get back to Object Oriented Immutable code before your economic provider involuntary associates your comments on this website via the intersectionality and "color" privilege of bias of your comments and declares you are wasting the time of economic organization!"
> In plain English, get back to writing code, brogrammer.
For some reason I don't think he should be the one worrying about being associated with his online comments.
