> Is this really fundamentally different to existing syscalls?
Originally & perhaps still DragonflyBSD was attempting to become a Single-System-Image OS, was supposed to allow multiple boxes to work together in a way that looked like a single computer.
I could definitely see making syscalls be more like messages as being a useful starting abstraction for this scenario.
Originally & perhaps still DragonflyBSD was attempting to become a Single-System-Image OS, was supposed to allow multiple boxes to work together in a way that looked like a single computer.
I could definitely see making syscalls be more like messages as being a useful starting abstraction for this scenario.