Maybe quoting Roy Amara, a 1960s Stanford Computer scientist. He said "we overestimate the impact of technology in the short-term and underestimate the effect in the long run" [0].
I dimly remember similar sentiments in Arthur C. Clarke's Profiles of the Future (1662) [1], where he talked about "Hazards of Prophecy", where predictions suffered from either "failure of imagination" (predicted too little change) or "failure of nerve" (could/should have foreseen far reaching change, but chickened out and wrote down a watered-down version).
As ACC said it "The failure of nerve seems to be the more common; it occurs when even given all the relevant facts the would-be prophet cannot see that they point to an inescapable conclusion."
