Nope, the original question was if we should "abolish the idea", not the thing itself.
I'm saying that the idea is a myth in the same way that "unbiased news" is a myth. Both sound like a nice idea on the surface, but with both eventually it all boils down to humans making decisions that elevate one viewpoint (bias) over another, and this holds true whether we are publishing newspapers or publishing HTML documents.
Adding another step (e.g. "human writes code; code publishes HTML document") unfortunately doesn't fix this either.
Nope, the original question was if we should "abolish the idea", not the thing itself.
I'm saying that the idea is a myth in the same way that "unbiased news" is a myth. Both sound like a nice idea on the surface, but with both eventually it all boils down to humans making decisions that elevate one viewpoint (bias) over another, and this holds true whether we are publishing newspapers or publishing HTML documents.
Adding another step (e.g. "human writes code; code publishes HTML document") unfortunately doesn't fix this either.