Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

'Common folk' engaging in day trading are signing themselves up to be milked, regardless of which exchange they use. If you're one of those common folk, my best advice for you is to stop.

If you want to invest, buy an index fund. If you want to gamble, go to a casino.

If you want to gamble, while fooling yourself that you're investing, day-trade options, preferably in a meme stock.



I see posts like yours so often. They're ubiquitous.

It's like saying 'you don't need anything more than Windows Home. Just leave everything on default, let Microsoft work for you! Everything else is worthless overcomplicated crap.'

Meanwhile, the reality is that finance (much like any other industry) is filled to the brim with mediocrity, and even spending a cursory amount of time doing research would net a significant positive income flow. But people don't do it. They get discouraged when they find out the markets aren't 'fair', everyone has an 'edge', and they resign themselves into thinking that the best way to make money is to just give it away to one of the big players that made it all so unfair in the first place.

They milk your money for all its worth and give you a pittance, but you remain content with yourself because this month you made 6% return on your 'investments'. The S&P went up, after all, and you, the intelligent market participant, were there to reap the benefits :^)

Meanwhile, the 'intelligent' money that outwits you throws it all in Chinese Starbucks competitors that cook the books[1], speculative electric car companies that roll parts kits downhill[2], or leverages billion dollar funds 5:1 resulting in a magnificent $10bn implosion.

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luckin_Coffee

[2]https://arstechnica.com/cars/2020/09/nikola-admits-prototype...

[3]https://www.cnbc.com/2021/04/27/ubs-nomura-push-global-banks...


> or leverages billion dollar funds 5:1 resulting in a magnificent $10bn implosion.

You left out the best part: The $50B was used to bet on 90 Day Fiancé and Star Trek. Bill Hwang is a true degenerate gambler.


Source? I googled some keywords from your post and came up empty.


Those are TLC (Discovery) and CBS (Viacom) shows, respectively, which are two of the main stocks Archegos traded in.


" If you want to gamble, go to a casino."

Yeah, I wouldnt go that far, daytrading reputable shares is still better than casino


I put day trading in the same category as betting on horse races.

There's punters who make good money on the horses, just like there's investors who make good money day trading, but most casual punts are little better than random guesswork.


Just to expand on why horse racing is a little different: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parimutuel_betting


It really isn't.


A single gamble in a liquid stock has an expected cost of 0.2%-1.0% of the notional value, due to crossing the bid-ask spread twice, which is smaller than casino margins.

So it is better in terms of expected costs if we're comparing 1 daytrade gamble with 1 casino gamble.


The casino has negative expected returns (the house always wins). The market has positive expected returns, by and large. Better gamble there.


On the index, yes, but active picking should expect to lose to the market.


You can lose relative to the market but still come out positive, maybe even beating inflation. There’s still a lot more room there than the net negative expectation of a casino wager.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: