> Hmm, not quite. My point was that if they aren't a good enough programmer to understand why the code is wrong, then chances are they would've written bad code or copy pasted bad code anyways. It just makes the cycle faster.
No, not quite. It also makes the cycle more permanent and its results deeply ingrained, which is what is actually relevant.
Either way it wouldn’t matter since the only thing short of stopping the cycle is stack overflow to close down and a new stack overflow not to open up. A very unlikely scenario for this industry. Either way , no matter the difference in time frame, the result would have always been permanent.
No, not quite. It also makes the cycle more permanent and its results deeply ingrained, which is what is actually relevant.