If eyewitness accounts are not evidence, what would pass as evidence to you? Anyone with children in public school has seen this. Do you really need a peer reviewed study on every piece of information to form a worldview?
What a few people in the whole country say is necessarily credible and is evidence of a widespread trend? Wow. Do you know what you can find people saying, especially on the Internet?
It's surprising that people, especially on HN where evidence is commonplace, and especially in a discussion on propaganda, are so triggered by that. Note that almost nobody in this thread is discussing the facts of the original claim, they all are trying to change the subject to me.
> Anyone with children in public school has seen this.
What I read is, 'I'm so sure that I haven't even looked for or at evidence.' It's not a good sign.
Fact and reason are the difference between burning witches at the stake on one hand, and justice, fairness, truth, law, and science on the other.
> What I read is, 'I'm so sure that I haven't even looked for or at evidence.' It's not a good sign.
What you should read is that there is so much obvious evidence, easily available, that asking for more of it can only be interpreted as bad faith. I am certain that there is no evidence that fits your standard, because short of "Study: Schools taken over by radicals" you would not accept it. A scientific study like this would never be funded, even if this were a question for science (it isn't), for many reasons.
A google search of the relevant terms would turn up dozens of egregious instances. Have you looked?
