Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You're kind of making the same point I was. People don't choose an OS for the sake of the OS, it's for the application support.

I like using Windows as much as macOS or Linux. For different parts of my day I'll be using Windows or Linux or Android or iOS and at on each system the OS is there to support the applications I want to use.



It's called "walled garden" actually.


No it isn't. If you wanted to call iOS a walled garden, I wouldn't argue. I would also say it's not necessarily a bad thing.

I wouldn't call Windows, Linux, or macOS walled gardens.


> I have never met a single person in my entire life who likes using Windows. Everyone I know claims "yeah it's crap but this CAD/Industry standard software works only in Windows".

If this is not a walled garden, I don't know what is. Linux is certainly not a walled garden.


In computing, a walled garden is a closed ecosystem controlled by the platform owner.

None of Windows, macOS, or Linux are walled gardens because all of them allow anybody to publish software for those platforms. You don't need approval and you don't need to distribute through a central authority.

iOS, on the other hand, can only load apps from the App Store and that store only carries software approved by Apple.

What you are talking about is proprietary software. That's a different beast.


Maybe you are right in terms of strict definitions, but in reality the proprietary software effectively creates the walled garden from which the users can't escape.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: