Uh making people stateless against human rights is about stripping people of their last citizenship. Israel is not doing that at all (in contrast to most EU countries these days I might add, who are doing this, which shows once again just how empty human rights really are).
It is very much not about allowing a new state to spring up in the middle of an existing country. Especially not when rockets are involved.
>Uh making people stateless against human rights is about stripping people of their last citizenship.
Most of the world recognises Palestine as a state. Israel does not and is making it disappear thus making these people stateless.
It could annex these people's land with or without without recognising Palestine and hand em citizenship in the process but that's generally not the case.
>in contrast to most EU countries these days I might add, who are doing this, which shows once again just how empty human rights really are
I find this a bit unrelated but am curious non the less. I haven't heard of this so can you provide examples? (Ones not being fought in court atm) The cases i've heard had all had a non-eu citizenship.
>It is very much not about allowing a new state to spring up in the middle of an existing country.
I suspect you are being wilfully obtuse when you ignore nothing is springing up out of nowhere and the borders of said existing country have been constantly shifting to grow. It sounds like you're talking about the creation of Israel if anything which is probably too far back to be worth discussing much.
Generally this is done with (of course alleged) terrorism as an excuse, although this does not seem to be the case in practice. In Belgium, there were two cases where citizenship was stripped, one involving an orphan and one involving lying to the state unemployment agency about owning foreign "property" (a shack, not rented out ...) In both cases, I find it very hard to believe either person had anything remotely to do with terrorism, yet that's what happened anyway.
The second "big" cause of revoking citizenship is people who acquired more than one citizenship (and aren't rich, then there is no problem ...) and don't "do their utmost to cancel their previous citizenship".
> I suspect you are being wilfully obtuse when you ignore nothing is springing up out of no
Sorry. I realise now that "springing up" is indeed not the correct term for the Israel-Palestine situation. That wording can be much improved. I'm saying that the legislation is about states depriving their own citizens of citizenship, and doesn't apply to the semi-almost-but-not-entirely 2 state situation in Israel.
Likewise there is nothing in this legislation that prevents property from being confiscated.
It is very much not about allowing a new state to spring up in the middle of an existing country. Especially not when rockets are involved.