Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Anything low lying in that area is at high risk in a cascadia quake. Buildings on high ground "only" have the quake risk, which is still significant.



I'm more concerned about the homes that will go up in flames due to ruptured gas lines. With the fire department overwhelmed, the potential amount of toxic smoke/fumes post-quake scares me more than the quake. Assuming I survive, assuming my family/friends do, assuming we all even are happy about being survivors of something so colossal, at such scale...


There aren't many places with natural gas significantly west of I-5 in Washington. There's a main artery down WA-12 to Aberdeen and the harbor, and that's it.

There's no natural gas service anywhere else on the WA pacific coast, nor the northern coast of the olympic peninsula (Sequim, Port Angeles), or the west bank of the Hood canal. The entire Olympic Peninsula is without natural gas except for one metro area. They actually have to haul tanks full of the stuff to the paper mill in Port Townsend to use.


Yep, this is what always gets me about the original quote - the peninsula _does_ exist, and while the damage will be very significant, a lot of us will be just fine, and most assuredly not toast.

The aftermath will suck, however.


The worst smoke can do is suffocate you, or raise your risk of cancer, but you can move out of harm's way.

The quake itself and tsunami risk is the dangerous part for most people.


I dont think smoke is what you should be worried about during a natural gas explosion.

Nonetheless, id still be worried about things that will kill me, even if its not in the next 10 seconds. Dead is still dead.


The fire and explosions are dangerous to be sure, but the OP specifically called out smoke.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: