Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> but they're also orthogonal to maintainability

Not entirely. Some amount of maintainability is fixing mistakes that result in less correct or safe programs. By reducing occurrences of these classes of problems later, you're reducing the maintainability burden.

It's the same thing that makes a language with a type system more maintainable in the long run. Eliminating classes of errors pays dividends later. The decision to make is whether the extra effort at the time of creation is worth that reduction. Depending on the type of software, it's expected lifetime, and how many people are expected to use it, that may differ. For large scale engineering, I imagine the extra effort required up front is almost always worth it.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: