I hear what you're saying, but those whose mission is to encourage open source software don't call the SSPL anything but a source-available, proprietary software license. Like literally the organization that defined what "open source software" is.
While you may disagree, you aren't going to convince me to take your word over theirs, especially when I have come to the same conclusions they did on my own.
While you may disagree, you aren't going to convince me to take your word over theirs, especially when I have come to the same conclusions they did on my own.