Weirdly, this kind of syntactic idiosyncrasy is something that got me interested in Erlang. Finally a language that uses full stops when a routine full stops. I find most of the rest of its syntax uncomfortable (I didn’t spend much time with the language, I’m sure it’s fine when you’re used to it), but I always found it weird to end a completed statement with a statement-list-joining punctuation mark.
I thought of mentioning the Prolog heritage. Weirdly CSS (having the worst syntax consistency of any language I can think of) is hyphen-heavy and solves its negation infix operator ambiguity well: it needs to be surrounded by whitespace.
For Prolog/Erlang, I think the preceding syntax is disambiguating enough
I always thought this is a Wirthism because Pascal ends unit and program with an "end." (with a dot), whereas function and procedure are terminated with "end;". (with a semicolon). I don't know about other Wirth languages though, maybe it is Pascal specific and not really something typical for Wirth?
Erlang is great, and I got used to the punctuation, but it's kind of a pain when you're moving code around.
Oh, now this is the last thing, gotta take off the ; or replace a , with a .
At least when I was starting out, I'd have loved a more C-like syntax with {} and consistently semicolons. Of course, Elixir came and just got rid of most punctuation, which I like less.
Anyway, it's consistent and after a couple weeks of messing it up, I can consistently see where the mistake is from the compiler error; after several years, I still sometimes mess it up, but oh well. I can't recall having messed up the punctuation so much that it still compiled but wasn't what I meant, so it's almost always quick to recover.
things like this are how I know that there are too many people who are absolutely insane and who make mundane decisions.
absolute genius. is this what higher education teaches people? I didn't go to college, and maybe that was best.