In German legal thought and practice, we have the distinction between Buergerrechte (civil rights, perhaps) and Menschenrechte (human rights).
The former is for citizens, the latter for everyone.
In the US, privacy falls in something like the former: there are supposed to be legal safeguards to keep US citizens from being spied on, but eg the NSA wiretapping foreigners is fine and even encouraged.
> In German legal thought and practice, we have the distinction between Buergerrechte (civil rights, perhaps) and Menschenrechte (human rights).
That is my experience in a couple of other European countries as well. Of course, some rights are reserved to citizens: vote (although that is changing for local elections), things like service at embassies and consulates abroad, and some aspects of immigration.
But except for these narrow aspects, the law should be the same for everyone: we are not a caste system.
The former is for citizens, the latter for everyone.
In the US, privacy falls in something like the former: there are supposed to be legal safeguards to keep US citizens from being spied on, but eg the NSA wiretapping foreigners is fine and even encouraged.