Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Those scores almost without exception come from authoratative sources, not crowdsourcing.

If you crowdsource reputation, people will be able to buy it.




Thank you for your comment. Would you prefer to be rated by an authoritative source using inputs that are closed and unknown? Or, would you rather have your peers provide a rating in an open and transparent manner?

[I think] Crowdsourced opinions are an excellent way to make informed decisions about products/services. A great example is using Amazon.com for competing products:

Product A: 5.0 star rating | 32 reviews Product B: 4.5 star rating | 5,264 reviews

Which product would you weigh more heavily when making a buying decision?

Keep in mind that SELLFF is positioned as a Professional Network. Any response or feedback will be relative to you, in a professional capacity. This might include the quality of the service you provide, your communication skills, did you finish the job on time, etc.

Also, any reputation you earn as a seller works in your benefit when you consult with others as a buyer. People want to work with other people who they have confidence in. This is true on Uber,Lyft and AirBnB, where both parties "rate" each other.

I think a digital reputation is a vital part of a healthy marketplace.


People buy followers on Twitter. They buy likes on Instagram. They buy Amazon reviews, Google Play reviews, etc.

If your reputation system is taken seriously, people will buy their way into it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: